<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanny State Passes Ban on Selling Cigarettes in Pharmacies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/nanny-state-passes-ban-on-selling-cigarettes-in-pharmacies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/nanny-state-passes-ban-on-selling-cigarettes-in-pharmacies/</link>
	<description>Because the world needed one more</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 05:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LaterSkater</title>
		<link>http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/nanny-state-passes-ban-on-selling-cigarettes-in-pharmacies/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>LaterSkater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherdamnblog.com/?p=312#comment-185</guid>
		<description>hmm... I believe in that in principal, but in practice, I'm not sure where you draw the line.  What about people who want to pay not to be around gays, blacks, or women?  When do the rights of the minority need to be protected from the voice of the majority?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230; I believe in that in principal, but in practice, I&#8217;m not sure where you draw the line.  What about people who want to pay not to be around gays, blacks, or women?  When do the rights of the minority need to be protected from the voice of the majority?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antigrammatik</title>
		<link>http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/nanny-state-passes-ban-on-selling-cigarettes-in-pharmacies/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Antigrammatik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherdamnblog.com/?p=312#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I'm okay with legislation that governs public land or locations, like parks, schools, municipal buildings, etc since that is government property and so they should be free to do as they please. But private businesses and private land? That should be up to the owners of the property, yes that includes the NASCAR race. 

If the business wants to exclude the persons who do not wish to be around smokers then they should be able to allow that activity. If the business decides that it is in their best interest to not allow smoking, then that should be their option as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m okay with legislation that governs public land or locations, like parks, schools, municipal buildings, etc since that is government property and so they should be free to do as they please. But private businesses and private land? That should be up to the owners of the property, yes that includes the NASCAR race. </p>
<p>If the business wants to exclude the persons who do not wish to be around smokers then they should be able to allow that activity. If the business decides that it is in their best interest to not allow smoking, then that should be their option as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ep</title>
		<link>http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/nanny-state-passes-ban-on-selling-cigarettes-in-pharmacies/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>ep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherdamnblog.com/?p=312#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Or even public playgrounds, in the stands at the old NASCAR race, or the  elementary school.

Since second hand smoke is worse for you than first hand I guess we all should just light up ourselves for health reasons. 

Bars I can go either way on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or even public playgrounds, in the stands at the old NASCAR race, or the  elementary school.</p>
<p>Since second hand smoke is worse for you than first hand I guess we all should just light up ourselves for health reasons. </p>
<p>Bars I can go either way on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antigrammatik</title>
		<link>http://anotherdamnblog.com/index.php/nanny-state-passes-ban-on-selling-cigarettes-in-pharmacies/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Antigrammatik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherdamnblog.com/?p=312#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Yeah, second hand smoking laws totally make sense. Because people go to bars for their health. So of course we should ban smoking in all bars instead of leaving it up to the bar to decide if they're going to be a smoking bar or a non-smoking bar. Certainly, second hand smoke is the silent killer. You never notice when you're inhaling second hand smoke...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, second hand smoking laws totally make sense. Because people go to bars for their health. So of course we should ban smoking in all bars instead of leaving it up to the bar to decide if they&#8217;re going to be a smoking bar or a non-smoking bar. Certainly, second hand smoke is the silent killer. You never notice when you&#8217;re inhaling second hand smoke&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

